|
Neag School of Education Assessment CommitteeNeag Assessment Committee Overview (2011–2012)General Charge: The Neag Assessment Committee helps develop, implement, and refine the Neag Assessment Plan so that we ensure a participatory model across all departments and programs. Outcomes of this process may include the development of instruments and protocols, the implementation of assessment designs, the analyses of data, and feedback on assessment initiatives. Make-up: About 25 members. Two to three faculty from each of five departments; up to three students from each of five departments; two to three individuals to represent the teacher education program. SubcommitteesNeag Assessment Subcommittee on Teacher Preparation EducationGeneral Charge: Provides support and advice related to research/assessment activities related to teacher education. Outcomes of this process may include the development of instruments and protocols, the implementation of designs, the analyses of data, and providing feedback regarding initiatives. Make-up: Approximately 20. This committee is comprised of university experts (Neag, CLAS, and Agr), PreK–12 district and state representatives, undergraduate and graduate Neag students, and community members. This is a multi-disciplinary team of educational leaders, practitioners, and researchers working together collaboratively to address issues of measurement, assessment, evaluation, and statistical analysis. Neag Assessment Subcommittee on Administrator Preparation EducationGeneral charge: Provides support and advice related to assessment activities related to administrator education. Outcomes of this process may include the development of instruments and protocols, the analyses of data, and providing feedback regarding initiatives. Make-up: Approximately 10. This committee is comprised of all university stakeholders. This is a multi-disciplinary team working together collaboratively to address issues of measurement, assessment, and evaluation. Priorities: Develop, analyzes and report on UCAPP survey and evaluation tools. OATS Assessment Planning Neag Assessment SubcommitteeCharge: Facilitate OATS Assessment Plans Make-up: 1 liaison and 1 backup by department Priorities: OATS Working GroupsNeag Assessment Critical Friends Group on Clinic Evaluations and Surveys Using CheckboxCharge: Facilitate the knowledge and use of Checkbox for program surveys and forms Make-up: Program faculty interested or using Checkbox Priority: Sharing and using Checkbox Neag Assessment Advisory Group on AssessmentCharge: Feedback on Spotlight Make-up: faculty and external stakeholders Priorities: Spotlight Ad Hoc GroupsWebsite Assessment GuidelinesPurpose: Develop and recommend assessment guideline for the school assessment website. Research GuidelinesPurpose: Develop and recommend guidelines for the process of addressing inquiries for studies/information. School ClimatePurpose: Proposed the school climate survey(s) to be administered in 2012–2013
|